To: Anti-Bubba182
Hmmm. Dad is furious mom went public and "ruined the actress' life." "Ruined lives" is typical abortionist rhetoric. I wonder if mom went public because Dad was pushing for an abortion and thought her daughter might give in.
The actress needs to learn to keep her legs together. But to her credit, she didn't kill her baby.
To: ModelBreaker
I agree. The child will not be murdered, and that at least is a very good outcome.
25 posted on
12/20/2007 2:12:35 PM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: ModelBreaker
That’s what I was thinking. At least this will present the girl as pro-life. She can speak out against underage teen sex, and spin it in a positive pro-life way, and that abortion is not the answer.
28 posted on
12/20/2007 2:15:14 PM PST by
Ron in Acreage
(Thinking of new tagline)
To: ModelBreaker
“The actress needs to learn to keep her legs together. But to her credit, she didn’t kill her baby.”
Yep.
To: ModelBreaker
The actress needs to learn to keep her legs together. But to her credit, she didn't kill her baby. Agreed. This could have been one big disgusting advertisement for abortion.
34 posted on
12/20/2007 2:17:38 PM PST by
Callahan
To: ModelBreaker
I wonder if mom went public ... Channel surfing last night, one report said that "grandma" already pre-sold the baby pictures for $8M, if I heard right.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson