Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator
Sorry but Social Secuirty is a small part of the overall tax base.

Bull! The Social Security Administration is expected to spend over $600B in 2007, second only to Health and Human Services, and more than the entire Department of Defense.

Also, unlike income taxes, which are paid almost entirely by the rich and upper middle class, the Social Security Administration is funded primarily by the much larger numbers of lower wage earners. It's negative impact is much greater for these people, and is twice what it appears to be, when looking at a paycheck stub.

If it's such a good deal, why isn't it voluntary?

70 posted on 12/20/2007 1:24:15 PM PST by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: 3niner
...The Social Security Administration is expected to spend over $600B in 2007,...

And they collect far more (probably somewhere in the range of $100B to $200B) than they spend.

130 posted on 02/01/2008 7:00:38 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: 3niner

I suppose if politicians are truly committed to helping the working poor, eliminate Socialist Security. That will never happen though...


144 posted on 02/01/2008 7:49:27 PM PST by Xenophon450 (I guess I'll never know, some things under the sun can never be understood...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson