Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DonaldC
So what do you do for the people, say 55 and above who are expecting it and those already retired already on it?

This is why it has to be a phase-out. I think the only way to do it is to announce that from now on, no one will contribute to Social Security, and everyone who has contributed will get benefits based on the level they contributed; thus, a 25 year old will get obviously fewer benefits than a 60 year old.

Because you're not collecting social security tax any longer, it would need to be paid out of general revenues once the "trust fund" is exhausted, but although that's a bitter pill, it will get easier over time and is a choice that should be made.

52 posted on 12/20/2007 12:01:41 PM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius

Sounds like a good plan, tho continuing to pay benefits will be a Big Hit on the budget. Can we afford it? Especially if it means raising taxes.

Even if the tax isn’t called a SS tax, the taxpayers will know it is going to retirees and is essentially the same as the SS tax, but they won’t be getting any benefits from it. Will that be acceptable?


67 posted on 12/20/2007 1:06:35 PM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson