Replies

To: sitetest

This report has at least a couple of angles.

There’s the GIVING PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT to some evil corporate entity.

Then there’s INVOLVES A WOMAN LOBBYIST who has RETAINED COUNSEL.

34 posted on 12/20/2007 8:06:51 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)

To: sitetest

Oh, and then there’s this angle:

TRIED TO GET MAJOR NEWSPAPER OF RECORD TO SIT ON STORY.

35 posted on 12/20/2007 8:08:18 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)

To: sitetest

Then there’s INVOLVES A WOMAN LOBBYIST who has RETAINED COUNSEL.

Can a pre-emptive "signed affadavit" be far behind? Very Clintonian, that strategy.

38 posted on 12/20/2007 8:12:45 AM PST by vollmond (Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!)

To: sitetest

And then there is McCain’s hatred for the 1st AMENDMENT. Anyone surprised?

129 posted on 12/20/2007 9:51:51 AM PST by ridge

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794