Thanks for the referral is noted. However, the framers in my opinion did not leave the Constitution open to revision based on the moral thoughts of the day.
” Your choice of Earl Warren as the dividing line — even though you didn’t name him specifically, using the “second half of the 1900’s” as your line of demarcation — is not completely accurate. John Marshall, the “Great Chief Justice”, was the Earl Warren of his era and was just as controversial. Marshall was the archetype of the loose constructionist and expanded federal power starting with Marbury in 1803.”
After reading this I assume you meant this part for someone else because my thoughts were not on the subject you have provided above. If I am confused as to your post, please excuse my lack of understanding.
That portion of the reply should have gone to someone else. Sorry.