Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Read past the headline....

If the FEC is disabled, there is NO ONE to oversee the MASSIVE Democrat Voter Fraud we will be facing in 2008.

1 posted on 12/19/2007 9:06:05 PM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tcrlaf

How convenient.


2 posted on 12/19/2007 9:08:04 PM PST by EternalVigilance (For America's Revival - www.AlanKeyes.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
With RATS the end always justifies the means, no matter how many laws they have to break in the process.
4 posted on 12/19/2007 9:19:34 PM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
[Reid said he will not relent on von Spakovsky, who has come under heavy criticism from civil-rights groups, and he blamed the White House and Republicans for the stalemate. “If they do not, the responsibility for a defunct FEC willl rest solely on their shoulders,” Reid said.]

I like how this is worded. Reid refuses to allow a vote on FEC nominations and blames the one who made the nominations for the process not moving forward.

No wonder his Congress is enjoying the lowest approval numbers in history. What a boob!

6 posted on 12/19/2007 9:33:34 PM PST by spinestein (The answer is 42.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

I think it was just last year that the Clinton 2000 campaign finally got fined for taking illegal money.

The FEC doesn’t actually do anything, which is exactly what the demoncrats like. The states themselves will have to police the millions and millions (think I’m exaggerating?) of phony voters on their side.


7 posted on 12/19/2007 9:59:27 PM PST by bpjam (Harry Reid doesn't even have 32% of my approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

The Democrats have the majority but they still do not believe that they would win in a vote on his nomination.

So much for “every vote counts”.


10 posted on 12/19/2007 11:42:30 PM PST by weegee (If Bill Clinton can sit in on Hillary's Cabinet Meetings then GWBush should ask to get to sit in too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf; neverdem; Congressman Billybob
Gee.

But the MSM will be all over this discrimination. /Not.

What would be the actual results be in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Mass, upstate NY, MD, VA, Washington, Washington DC, OR, AZ, NM - if there were no inner city democrat vote fraud?

12 posted on 12/20/2007 12:10:24 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

>Sens, Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) placed holds on von Spakovsky’s nomination, meaning Republicans needed 60 votes to approve his nomination over Democratic objections.<

Obama? Can you say “Conflict of interest”?


15 posted on 12/20/2007 12:57:52 AM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

The FEC is a toothless old whore doesn’t matter at all in preventing any kind of election or campaign finance fraud. It’s a complete waste of tax dollars as far as I’m concerned.


16 posted on 12/20/2007 5:53:56 AM PST by Hardastarboard (DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
If the FEC is disabled, there is NO ONE to oversee the MASSIVE Democrat Voter Fraud we will be facing in 2008.

I think Castro is still willing to serve as an observer. Or was that offer withdrawn ?
17 posted on 12/20/2007 2:41:17 PM PST by festus (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson