Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzcarraldo

“I’ll vote for Thompson if Hunter becomes his running mate.”

Impossible. Surely you have heard of balancing the ticket? Thompson will be thought of as quite conservative by the majority of the electorate. Did Reagan pick a conservative for VP? No, he did not, he picked a Rockyfeller Republican.

Bush II ran as a compassionate (moderate) conservative, and picked a strong conserative with a lot of experience to balance his lack of same.

Rudy, Romney or Huckabee would pick a guy like Hunter. Fred would probably look for a candidate who could bring in a big state, and be seen as moderate.

Hunter will be up for a top cabinet position.

Yes, I know, you don’t like any of this at all.


25 posted on 12/19/2007 1:54:40 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Fred Thompson's Federalism is right on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: SaxxonWoods

People also don’t pick running mates that can’t deliver their home state, at least. Hunter obviously can’t.

People need to forget their Hunter-VP fantasies.


30 posted on 12/19/2007 2:03:44 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: SaxxonWoods

The biggest states are irredeemably Blue.

Unless you think Rudy as Veep could bring in NY ?

The only national figures from CA are Arnold who is ineligible and Hunter who doesn’t balance the ticket according to your view.

What does that leave ?

FL has Jeb, but a Bush on the ticket would turn away independents.

TX ? Maybe Ron Paul as Veep ?


42 posted on 12/19/2007 2:28:57 PM PST by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson