To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The bill does not call for new drilling, new nuclear plants, or new coal plants. Given that energy independence is a top national security priority, this energy bill helps our enemies. I for one see no reason why I should give up one iota of privacy to government spying or the patriot act if we are going to have wide open borders and be dependent on our enemies to sell us fuel. The borders and our energy policy prove to me that we are not serious about winning the war on terror.
21 posted on
12/19/2007 11:01:44 AM PST by
mysterio
To: mysterio
25 posted on
12/19/2007 11:09:06 AM PST by
quant5
To: mysterio
This Energy Bill could hardly be worse and all that voted for or signed it are very suspect. It does nothing to move this economy towards Energy Independence. This is no more than feel good crap that these public servants think will mollify their idiot constituents!
27 posted on
12/19/2007 11:18:26 AM PST by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: mysterio
An energy policy that produces no new energy.
What a “progressive” idea.
300 votes in the house and what, 75 in the Senate? Makes no difference if President Bush signed on or not. It’s a piece of veto proof crap.
This isn’t the country where I grew up. It’s turned into an insane asylum.
79 posted on
12/20/2007 12:51:35 AM PST by
Kickass Conservative
(Guns don't kill people, gun free zones kill people)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson