Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Incorrigible
Here’s an alternate argument. You could use his little four-square, TRUE/FALSE Opportunity diagram for CATASTROPHIC METEORITE collision. His single-threaded approach to how to address this vital issue plays out exactly the same.
Using his line of thinking, we better solve the threat of a global asteroid collision pronto.
Of course, this kool-aid drinker only plays out the absolutely worst case scenarios. Not only because it’s how he states the construct of the problem, in worst case suppositions, but it also plays on the fear of impending doom.
That’s all GW proponents have; Fear.
And, by the way, he can’t analyze Climate Change as a natural course of events. He has to keep it a simple four-square diagram, thereby limiting thought. It’s all under the guise of man-made, man-caused and man-preventable. His mother earth (his mom, not mine) is probably laughing her ass off at him as he postulates about man’s ability to affect change on the globe.
29 posted on
12/19/2007 8:55:36 AM PST by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
To: Incorrigible; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...
Proof that a lie will go 10 times around the world before the truth makes it to the sidewalk....
30 posted on
12/19/2007 8:57:05 AM PST by
xcamel
(FDT/2008)
To: Incorrigible
I couldn’t get through 2 minutes of this boring garbage.
32 posted on
12/19/2007 8:58:22 AM PST by
SIDENET
(Hubba Hubba...)
To: Incorrigible
The argument for Global warming is very simple.
33 posted on
12/19/2007 9:06:02 AM PST by
Bon mots
To: Incorrigible
We don't have to know for certain whether human-induced global warming is really occurring to act on it, because "the risk of not acting far outweighs the risk of acting."This type of argument is not enough to pre-empt the nut case in Iran from getting the Nuke Bomb, but it is OK to put the world's economy in the tank and implement socialism "just in case".
Liberal Morons All
35 posted on
12/19/2007 9:49:31 AM PST by
SteamShovel
(Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
To: Incorrigible
‘As a young man, he camped out for four days in the Honolulu airport to reflect on his year of traveling in Asia.’
Lost me at this point....
36 posted on
12/19/2007 9:54:00 AM PST by
Badeye
(No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
To: Incorrigible
Even if I agreed that we should act....I don’t agree that we should spend trillions attempting to stop GCC....that money would be better spent preparing for it...at the very least we know we can prepare for it....there is absolutely no proof we can prevent it....trying too would be a fools errand...IMHO....
37 posted on
12/19/2007 10:10:44 AM PST by
PigRigger
(Donate to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org - The Troops have our front covered, let's guard their backs!)
To: Incorrigible
Here’s another dubious assumption the guy makes: Any change in the climate will be unambiguously bad. In other words, the current climate is perfect and any deviation from it will have negative consequences. I don’t know how you can justify that assumption.
38 posted on
12/19/2007 11:08:24 AM PST by
DManA
To: Cacique
To: Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy
~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ping~~
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson