Science teacher eh? Heh. Education degree teaching science. What a maroon. When are we going to demand that our teachers actually have education in the courses they are teaching? This clown couldn’t pass: elementary stats, calculus, logic, physics.....and the list goes on and on. Oh, perhaps he could work for CNN.
Big government destroying the world or Mother Nature destroying the world.
I’ll trust Mother long before any government.
read later
The scariest part? Dipsh*ts just like this guy will actually be making the policy that affects us all.
This guy’s column A, bottom should be just the same as column A, top. The $ will cause the same results—”global depression”—whether or not it is in the top or bottom box. Further, his words are more inflamatory when it suits his purpose.
An Al Gore planet circling the Gore star and basking it its warmth. Expect many more like him and the state of science education is so dismal that very few viewers of his video can even provide a critical analysis of anything he says.
“...he and his wife, Jodi Coleman, 37, got high-speed Internet nine months ago.”
Way to stay ahead of the curve there, genius.
ping. Junk science ping?
In a nutshell. We should throw tons of money into GW “solutions” just in case it’s true. Using his logic, we should build a shield around the planet in case we get hit by a massive meteor. It would be money well spent.
This guy’s biggest problem is his original premise that:
“We all can agree that human activity COULD contribute to GCC”
Why should we all agree to that? All I have to do is look back upon recoded history/geological history and there is no evidence that human activity has any consequence in global climate patterns.
At most humans can make individual cities warming (pavements, etc) or destroy individual rivers (pollution)
But the idea of even entertaing the proposition that Human caused global climate change is even possible is completely preposterous.
I reject this guy’s reasoning outright.
Well, If it’s popular on MySpace it’s gotta be educational
We can’t make the case that humans are wrecking the atmosphere so I have to come up with an “argument” making that question moot.
Just be honest and try to sell us on the wonderful world we would have if we turn our lives over to a global government. Good luck on that.
His logic is exactly the same as the rich man, faced with his imminent death, calling his lawyer to change his will to leave his fortune to the church.
He thinks this will buy his salvation from an appreciative god who has been appeased, but he still harbors doubts whether his coach will end up at the right station when the trip is over.
Only this guy wants everybody to carpool with him.
One out of many scary things about this guy's mindset is that he appears to be totally confused about the meaning of "critical thinking". Maybe he imagines that "critical thinking" means being critical of the Bush administration or of Western Civilization or something equally balmy and superficial and wrong.
It reminds me of clueless leftists who have claimed that "political correctness" meant "adhering to conservative principles" rather than toeing the lines set down by loony leftists, and therefore the gauntlet of PC idiocies that burden everyday life are therefore not connected in any way to political correctness (because, according to their fuzzy understanding, since "conservatives" were in control of the Presidency as well as both houses of Congress, the term 'politically correct' meant adhering to the politics of the political majority in the government).
No amount of logic, reason, or patient explanation can get through the haze of confusion that seemingly envelops misguided brains such as those...