Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

“He basically said in this interview that the US was an occupying power in Saudi Arabia during the First Gulf War.”

That is the reason given by OBL for his attack on the US. Whether you agree or not is irrelevant.


84 posted on 12/19/2007 8:27:19 AM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: taxed2death
Whether you agree or not is irrelevant.

No it isn't. The point is Ron Paul called us an occupying power. We were/are not. We are there by invitation of the Saudi Arabian government.

Just because OBL (0r Ron Paul for that matter) doesn't like the fact of our presence does not make the invitation any less valid. But the fact of the invitation invalidates Paul's viewpoint.

86 posted on 12/19/2007 8:31:30 AM PST by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: taxed2death
That is the reason given by OBL for his attack on the US. Whether you agree or not is irrelevant.

The legal and historical fact is that the US never occupied Saudi Arabia, but was an invited guest and ally of the Saudi Arabian government.

Whether your friend Osama Bin Laden or your friend Ron Paul or you disagree with this historical fact is irrelevant.

96 posted on 12/19/2007 8:55:42 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson