Good luck with that one!
“...at this stage of her career..”
Really, did any of us, even one, give a rat’s bottom what Jean Kirkpatrick looked like? Hell, no. She was a woman of substance (whose views corresponded rather nicely with our own). Any of us would have voted for Kirkparick in the proverbial New York Minute.
Hillary is not a woman of substance, (not to mention her views being quite the opposite of ours) and that’s the bottom line. Her IMAGE that’s being sold includes their trying to cling to ‘92 when the Clintons were the young couple seeking the White House. The intervening years have not been kind (other than to the Clintons’ bankroll).
Wasn’t it Churchill who said we are responsible for our looks after 40?