Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LdSentinal

At first I thought it must be true because he would sue, sue, and sue some more if it weren’t. Then, in reading the details of the article, I think that it is his staffer’s and not his. He’s got too much invested in being female-sensitive, especially with a wife with cancer (wow—can you imagine a wronged-woman being a cancer victim?). Think that the tabloid might have gone off too far on this limb. Speculation aside, it will take a 1 minute DNA test on Jerry Springer to see what’s up (or whose was up).


113 posted on 12/19/2007 1:24:30 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MHT
Unless he drags his feet regarding the DNA, as Howard K. Stern did and lied that he was the father. I agree this would have been such a stupid thing for Edwards to do considering what he had to lose.

Then I think of Clinton & Monica that was stupid beyond anything, Craig in the bathroom, Shandra Levy case.

156 posted on 12/19/2007 5:59:57 AM PST by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson