Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: najida

Hey..Margret Thatcher always looked fine to me. Not a date candidate, but very distinguished senior citizen.
I prefer that we pick on the Hildebeast for her character, personality, policies, crimes etc. So what if she is ugly, fat, sweats a lot and has bad breath.


19 posted on 12/18/2007 8:32:03 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Oldexpat

“...I prefer that we pick on the Hildebeast for her character, personality, policies, crimes etc. So what if she is ugly, fat, sweats a lot and has bad breath.”

I agree. I care more about her Marxist policies than her cankles and and crusty pantsuit.


24 posted on 12/18/2007 8:36:01 AM PST by LottieDah (Democrats and liberals, they never fail to disappoint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Oldexpat
I agree with you. Hillary's looks are my least objection to her - actually for her age she does not look bad.

Unfortunately many voters do react to physical appearance. There was one article a long time ago - a survey? - that stated the reason the media went so viciously after Dan Quayle is that he was handsome and resembled Robert Redwood and the media was afraid he would be easily become the next POTUS.

Several Democrats have stated that they fear Mitt Romney is the most electable GOP candidate because he has the experience - he has been a governor - and he has a high likability factor and looks presidential, the handsomest of the candidates. I have no idea what percentage of voters would be swayed by this - but studies have indicated that at last some do.

159 posted on 12/18/2007 10:44:18 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson