Except most of the Paulistinians seem to think that the Constitution does not protect life or authorize the commander-in-chief to protect the country. They also seem to overlook the reality that the Founding Fathers who went on to become presidents did not seem to have a problem with entering into armed conflict without congressional approval.
Agreed. If congress feels the need to declare "war" or "the use of force" is needed and the President decides to exercise that option, their territory belongs to us when conquered.
Welcome to the union, via conquest or of their governments volition.
Except most of the Paulistinians seem to think that the Constitution does not protect life or authorize the commander-in-chief to protect the country. They also seem to overlook the reality that the Founding Fathers who went on to become presidents did not seem to have a problem with entering into armed conflict without congressional approval.
Ron Paul states that the Constitution does protect life, but that it should be done on the State level, where criminal laws are enforced.
As for warfare, Ron Paul accepts the view that military actions can be undertaken when immediately needed to protect U.S. lives and property.
That is not an excuse for Congress to abrogate its responsibility in declaring war when it is justified.
I think an attack on our cities would be considered justified.