That’s because you support the cut and run coward.
[ “So, why haven’t we hit Iran for killing U.S. troops?” ]
Who says that something isn’t already in the works?
Well, the Bush admininstration is certainly taking its time in doing so.
Besides why the hell would you care? Your heerow el run paul has said that Iran is not a threat, that they have no military, That everything being said about them is false, and that he wouldn’t attack them.
If U.S. troops are going to be exposed to the Iranians, they should be protected.
If Iran is such a threat, why isn't anything being done about them and why aren't you tough talking sorts demanding it?
Paul would remove U.S. troops so they wouldn't be targets.
[ “I call them hypocrites.” ]
Yet you think that “Do as I say, not as I do” paul is a truthful and honorable man.
Paul is an honorable man-and nothing you anti-Paul zealots had brought up shows otherwise.
Speaks volumes about the ingrained hypocrisy of your views.
Speaks more to the blind irrational hatred on your part and the rest of the anti-Paul zealots.
I guess it makes you feel more patriotic to attack him but not to attack the guys in power who actually have the ability and responsibity to do something.
[“More empty rhetoric.”]
We expect nothing less from the paul campaign
And I expect nothing less from the anti-Paul zealots.
[ “I do not see any U.S. Bombers flying over Iran?” ]
That’s because they’re STEALTH bombers.....You know, the very same bombers that your heerow voted to kill.
Oh, yes and are any of those 'stealth' bombers dropping any bombs?
Maybe the bombs are stealth also, and are destroying the enemy but we just don't know it.
As for defense spending, Paul believes in a strong national defense.
[“The Old Right conservatives want to take back our foreign policy and fight for U.S. interests, not global ones. So much of what you rant and rave about is really anti-neocon and pro-Old Right.” ]
Oh so now the America hating terrorist supporting freak show known as the ron paul pollution is trying to claim the mantle of the “Old Right”?
That is exactly his position, that he is representing the principles of the Old Right, of non-interventionism and defending American interests, not those of the Globalists, as put forth by the neocons.
[ “So stop nominating RINO Republicans.” ]
Oh, so we can nominate the RINO that you support?
No, you can support a Republican who actually wants to defend American values, not those of the UN.
[ “It will not be done by any neocon!” “And it should be the neocons that you are complaining about since they controlled policy during the Vietnam war (no victory) and are controlling it now (no victory).” ]
Oh no! The big bad neocon boogyman! You paul supporters sound just like the communists that populate the DUmp or dailykos with your shrill cries about neocons.
Well, you had better check out who is actually in control of the foreign policy of this nation and their neocon affilitations.
But then again everyone who refuses the ron paullution is a neocon in your book.
No, but if any of those major candidates get nominated, it will just be 'busisness as usual' with the same neocon foreign policy.
[ “I believe that if U.S. troops are fighting they should be given the chance to actually win, not fight to create a NWO and put on trial for war crimes whenever they kill the enemy.” ]
None of our troops have been put on trial for “war crimes”. They have been put on trial for abusing prisoners. They have been put on trial for killing prisoners. They have been put on trial for murdering innocent civilians. ALL of which is in accordance with the UCMJ (UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE) which is the Congressional Code of Military Criminal Law applicable to all military members worldwide.
Charged with war crimes, U.S. troops get legal help from home http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/22/asia/troops.
US Law Concerning War Crimes TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > § 2441 § 2441. War crimes
(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.
(b) Circumstances.— The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).
(c) Definition.— As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct—
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;
(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
(3) which constitutes a violation of common Article 3 of the international conventions signed at Geneva, 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party and which deals with non-international armed conflict; or
(4) of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians.
http://www.nogw.com/warcrimes.html