Don’t ever associate the honorable Duncan Hunter with that terrorist appeasing cut and run coward you support.
Well, Duncan Hunter has a three step progrem regarding Iraq and the 3rd step is getting Americans out of Iraq.
Unlike the neocons who think America should stay forever in Iraq.
So, the only thing that Duncan Hunter and Ron Paul disagree regarding U.S. troops in Iraq is their timetable in leaving, but both agree that they need to leave.
And you disingenuously failed to include the FACT that Duncan Hunter wants to pull the troops out AFTER victory is achieved.
In fact, here is what the Honorable Mr. Hunter has said:
"The idea that Congress pulls the rug out from under the soldiers as they're actually carrying the mission out, by condemning this mission . . . I thought it was a disservice to our soldiers. There is a right way to leave Iraq and that is to continue to rotate Iraqi battalions that we've trained and equipped into the fight."
That chickensh*t cut and run coward that YOU support says this:
"RETREAT!"
"Unlike the neocons who think America should stay forever in Iraq."
And according to that cut and run coward YOU support, Duncan Hunter is a neocon too because *GASP* he wants to WIN before bringing the troops home.
"So, the only thing that Duncan Hunter and Ron Paul disagree regarding U.S. troops in Iraq is their timetable in leaving, but both agree that they need to leave."
No.
The difference is Duncan Hunter wants our troops to WIN before they come home.
YOUR little cut and run coward wants to tuck tail and run.
BIG difference.