Even if all you wrote is exact, the punishment has already been sufficient, and the two must start new careers if the liberals ever let them out.
Even if all you wrote is exact, the punishment has already been sufficient, and the two must start new careers if the liberals ever let them out.
Not if they're pardoned - a pardon would let these crooked cops back into law enforcement.
How can the punishment be "sufficient" if the judge threw out the mandatory sentence in favor of one 1/5 as long?
Are mandatory sentences good enough for other crooks but not these two? If you're for removing all mandatory sentences, you could perhaps make that case. Are you?