Skip to comments.
The Obama-Clinton Issue (The NY Times Dumping on Hillary Alert)
New York Times ^
| December 18, 2007
| David Brooks
Posted on 12/18/2007 3:06:41 AM PST by Zakeet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: Zakeet
21
posted on
12/18/2007 8:52:43 AM PST
by
Gritty
(Unlike Bill, a jazz impresario of people-pleasing prevarication,she's a terrible liar-Jonah Goldberg)
To: Zakeet
Thanks for the backhanded b*tch slap to NY’s junior Senator!
22
posted on
12/18/2007 7:44:43 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: Zakeet
If Clinton were running against Obama for Senate, it would be easy to choose between them. Oh, puhleeze. As if this imbecil is fit to be president of the carpool...
To: the invisib1e hand
Exactly. The article has to pander, though...because its audience only agrees with those who pander to their biases.
But Clinton and Obama are mere *junior* senators.
In the meantime, Democrats ignore experienced statesmen like Sam Nunn and Joe Lieberman because they aren’t pandering to whatever PC fad is in vogue today (e.g. global warming, impeach Bush, surrender Iraq, “hate crimes” laws to jail anyone who disagrees with the Gay Agenda, nationalize healthcare, ban guns, $50 abortions on every streetcorner, etc.).
24
posted on
12/19/2007 7:06:12 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
