Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: 165,000 asylum seekers to get 'amnesty' because of Home Office blunder over files
The Daily Mail (U.K.) ^ | December 18, 2007 | JAMES SLACK

Posted on 12/18/2007 1:33:22 AM PST by Stoat

165,000 asylum seekers to get 'amnesty' because of Home Office blunder over files

by JAMES SLACK - More by this author » Last updated at 08:41am on 18th December 2007

As many as 165,000 asylum seekers are to be granted an "amnesty" to live in Britain, it was revealed.

The vast bulk of the migrants are failed refugees whose files were left lying in boxes by bungling Home Office staff.

They have now been living here so long that officials have ruled that it would be a breach of their human rights to kick them out.

Ministers admitted that the first 19,000 have already been granted leave to remain under what the Tories described as a "stealth amnesty".

Scroll down for more...

asylum seekers

The vast bulk of the migrants are failed refugees whose files were left lying in boxes by bungling Home Office staff (file picture)

All will now be free to bring their relatives to Britain - and claim the full range of benefits.

The revelation came amid a flurry of alarming admissions rushed out on the last day of Parliament before the Christmas recess.

It emerged that more than three million motorists are at risk of identity fraud after their personal details went missing.

The Home Office was also forced to admit it had been employing an illegal immigrant - as a security guard - for more than 18 months.

But it was the asylum fiasco that caused the greatest concern.

Councils have already been warned to make the migrants a priority for council housing. They will also be entitled to apply for British passports in four or five years.

The fiasco centres on 450,000 asylum claims uncovered by the Home Office last year in the wake of the foreign prisoner scandal. They were left lying around in boxes, with some files dating back to the mid-90s.

 

Lin Homer

Lin Homer, chief executive of the Border and Immigration Agency, said: 'If someone has no right to remain in the UK, they will be removed'

Officials say they are a combination of failed refugees who should have been deported, and people whose claims became lost in the chaotic asylum system.

Lin Homer, chief executive of the Border and Immigration Agency, said of the 52,000 cases concluded to date, 19,000 - or 36.5 per cent - have been given leave to remain in Britain.

If, as expected, cases continue to be granted at the same rate, a total of 165,000 will be allowed to stay.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch UK, said: "The Home Office seem to be dealing with this enormous backlog of cases by dishing out permission to stay to tens of thousands of thousands of people who have not qualified for asylum.

"These failed asylum seekers now have a meal ticket for life and a place in the queue for social housing.

"It is hard to imagine a more dismal outcome for the billions of pounds that the Government has spent on the asylum system."

Some 17,000 of the 52,000 cases checked to date have been discounted, as they were duplicate records.

The Home Office said the remaining 16,000 had been removed from Britain since the trawl began. The cases do not apply to any particular date, officials said.

The remainder of the 450,000 cases will be considered over the next four years.

Shadow home secretary David Davis said: 'After 18 months' effort and on their own numbers the Government can still only claim to have removed 3 per cent of the backlog.

"At this rate it will take decades to remove the backlog, by which time we will have another backlog since the Government is also failing to meet its target of removing more failed asylum seekers than arrive.

"Since these are people who had not been granted the right to remain in the UK, this combination of low removal rates and lengthy delays, means this is effectively a stealth amnesty. This is a policy by incompetence rather than decision."

The Daily Mail - correctly predicting yesterday's announcement - revealed in August how councils had been sent letters preparing them for the news, as all of those approved will immediately-become entitled to apply for a local authority-house.

The major reason why so many of the claims will be approved is the Human Rights Act.

Those who have been in the country for many years can claim it is now their home and they no longer have links to their homeland.

The legislation, passed by Labour, also prevents the removal of asylum seekers to countries where they could face torture or persecution, which is likely to apply to thousands of cases in the backlog.

A Home Office document on how the scheme - known as the Legacy Exercise by the department - will operate says "each case will be evaluated on its individual merits, with an assessment of any human rights factors that may be relevant".

Lin Homer said: "This is not an amnesty. Individuals are judged according to the law.

"If someone has no right to remain in the UK, they will be removed - forcibly if necessary. Last year we removed record numbers of people. To date we have concluded 52,000 cases.

"Two thirds have either been removed, or discovered to be duplicate files or errors."

Councils are furious that they are being made to take responsibility for Government bungling.

Andrew Carter, alternate leader of Leeds City Council, warned it was "nothing more than a crude amnesty".


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: asylum; britain; england; greatbritain; immigrantlist; uk; unitedkingdom
A similar thing could easily happen here in the USA under a Socialist (Democrat) administration.

Endless excuses would be made as to how the illegals can't now be deported because of "human rights" laws, and we would then have a de-facto amnesty as well as an essentially open southern border.

Tolerating Socialism is the same as giving our country and our heritage away....both in a philosophical and a tangible sense.

1 posted on 12/18/2007 1:33:26 AM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Yep, just like on 911, the hostages thought the ploy was Israel or lack of money, when the prime original objective was murder, moping ops murder of neighbors and people.

Any and all excuse to advance murder behind the veil of “political demands” and “lack of money” etc.

When will we learn?


2 posted on 12/18/2007 1:57:21 AM PST by JudgemAll (control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

A similar thing (Shamnesty) very nearly did happen here. You remember the parsings and deceptiveness, I’m sure . If they have been here X number of years we have to give them some aspirations of citizenship. No matter how nice a package they tried to wrap it up in it was still Amnesty. Oh, and in regard to British taxpayers footing the bill for an Iranian ostrich farm; I don’t even want to know. It sounds like something right out of a Python sketch lol


3 posted on 12/18/2007 2:16:53 AM PST by WildcatClan (Vote Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
"If someone has no right to remain in the UK, they will be removed -

No they wont be removed.

You see, Prime Minister Brown signed the Lisbon treaty ( european constitution), last friday by dark of night, without the consent of his people.

Immigration and assylum are now under Brussells control, they will tell you who can stay and who can't.

The brits had best save their country NOW or its gone.

4 posted on 12/18/2007 2:34:56 AM PST by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Why is the west committing cultural suicide by allowing these fanatical enemies to invade our countries?


5 posted on 12/18/2007 3:23:35 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Coming soon to a country near you.


6 posted on 12/18/2007 4:16:41 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Coming soon to our own country.....


7 posted on 12/18/2007 5:21:33 AM PST by netmilsmom (Financing James Marsden's kid's college fund, 1 ticket, 1 DVD at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; All

Bump!


8 posted on 12/18/2007 2:32:09 PM PST by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson