Posted on 12/17/2007 4:29:50 PM PST by wagglebee
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Mitt Romney participated in a weekend interview with Tim Russert of the NBC program "Meet the Press" and he restated, has he has countless times before, why he changed his position on abortion. Romney also reiterated his position allowing researchers to destroy human embryos from fertility clinics for scientific studies.
Russert played a couple of videos from previous elections where Romney said he would not waver in his support for legalized abortion.
Asked why he changed his position, Romney shared the old story of confronting the destruction of human life through embryonic stem cell research and how it prompted him to become pro-life.
"Well, you know, Tim, I was always personally opposed to abortion, as I think almost everyone in this nation is. And the question for me was, what is the role of government?" Romney explained.
Romney said he now believes that life begins at the point of conception.
"I do. I believe, I believe from a, from a, a political perspective that life begins at conception. I, I don't, I don't pretend to know, if you will, from a theological standpoint when life begins," he explained.
The former Massachusetts governor also restated his position that his supports a human life amendment and overturning Roe v. Wade but doesn't think Americans are ready for the amendment yet.
"My view is that the right next step in the, in the fight to preserve the sanctity of life is to see Roe v. Wade overturned and then return to the states and to the elected representatives of the people the ability to deal with, with life and abortion on their own," he said.
"And ultimately, as, as an aspirational goal, I would love it if America came to a point where we're not today, where the people of America would, would welcome a society that did not have abortion. But that's not where we are, and so I'm not promoting or fighting for a constitutional amendment to ban abortion in all 50 states," he added.
He said that abortion bans would not punish women but hold abortion practitioners accountable in the same way the partial-birth abortion ban does with fines, loss of medical license and prison terms.
On the issue of stem cell research, Romney again said he opposes the purposeful creation and destruction of human life.
However, he also would allow the destruction of human life by letting scientists destroy human embryos from fertility clinics for experiments.
"From a legal standpoint, I would outlaw cloning to create new stem cells and I would outlaw embryo farming," he said. "I would allow, on a private basis, the use of surplus embryos, so-called surplus embryos from in vitro fertilization, and likewise the existing lines."
Russert followed up on that point.
"But to be clear, the embryos that are so-called surplus in vitro clinics are destroyed for research, and you support that?" the MSNBC host asked.
"The term support is perhaps not the exact word I'd choose," Romney replied. "I would not outlaw it. I would allow, I would allow private laboratories and private institutions--as we currently do, and as the president does as well--to use these so-called surplus or embryos to be discarded."
Romney added a caveat that he supports embryo adoption and would promote that if elected president.
"That's the, that's the course I'd prefer. But I would not outlaw the use of these, of these surplus embryos if the parents so directed," he said.
When it comes to federal funding for stem cell research, he said funds should be directed at alternatives to the use of embryonic stem cells.
"I think the best source of our funding application should be in what are known as alternative methods," he said.
"But this recently saw a major breakthrough with direct reprogramming of, of human adult cells to become stem cells that can be very potent cells applied to help cure disease and, and serious conditions," he said.
"And the, the source of great cures in this country is going to come from this, this, this alternative methods of creating stem cells without having to create new embryos, but instead focusing on taking adult cells, turning them into stem cells just as we've seen with this great breakthroughs by Asian and American scientists," he added.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
I always thought his explanation about stem cell research as the basis to be ridiculous.
So he is ok with destroying embryos but he is against abortion because the notion of destroying embryos made him value life more. Um ok.
I disagree with him, but it’s the same position currently taken by President Bush on the issue.
And I don’t agree with Bush’s position either.
“”I do. I believe, I believe from a, from a, a political perspective that life begins at conception. I, I don’t, I don’t pretend to know, if you will, from a theological standpoint when life begins,” he explained.”
I feel your leadership man, awesome!
He’s another Clinton, EVERYTHING he does is based on the most recent polling. It only worked for Clinton because his base knew that no matter what he said, in the end he would be with them.
Oh trust me, they will...
What a great and inspiring speaker.
TRANSLATION:
Politically, I have to say I'm pro-life. For crying out loud, this is the Republican primary!
As far as my theological or philosophical beliefs, though, I have no clue and don't really care.
It was a rhetorical statement. Last week I offered a transcript from when he first said that he was okay with destroying embryos and they STILL denied it.
"Why did Rudy's numbers have to drop so soon? It used to be the conservatives only questioned him on pro-life issues."
Flash back to 1994 and 2002, and you’ll see a very different candidate. He supported the so-called “morning after” pill. Invoking his trailblazing mother, Romney made an ironclad commitment to Roe v. Wade.
Position of the week. Stay tuned for “clarification/revelation” next week.
Or ask him to explain why Massachusetts is the ONLY state which has homosexual marriage.
If he were to win the nomination, I imagine his pronouncements would become even more liberal.
Nixon was President, and he pulled his car over on that road in Cambodia to cry...Seared, seared into his memory. Flip Flop Flip Flop...
Just to stir the pot a bit...
“(Fred)Thompson went on to suggest he’s not concerned by the topsy-turvy nature of the Republican presidential race. “I am not willing to mold myself to the circumstances and I understand I’m not everybody’s cup of tea but what you see is what you get”
Whether you like Fred or not, he does not bend his positions to the polls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.