Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited
I am a woman, and I don’t feel that this discussion is inclusive. I feel marginalized by the all-male tone of the article, as if I don’t matter in the national dialogue. Human rights are for women, too. Where is the woman’s voice in the proceedings?

Now see, this is how you throw the entire train off the tracks!

12 posted on 12/17/2007 12:33:06 PM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ishabibble
Human rights are for women, too.

No, sorry. You only get Huperson rights. (Or is it Huwoman rights?)

16 posted on 12/17/2007 12:38:00 PM PST by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ishabibble

There was a woman who spoke at the hearing against Joey.
Not sure she is much of a woman....

Camille Charles, a sociology professor at the University of Pennsylvania, testified that Vento’s signs harken back to the “Whites only” postings of the Jim Crow era.
“The signs give a feeling of being unwelcome and being excluded,” Charles said.

I would like her to know that I dont welcome her and would like to exclude her from thinking. Shes an idiot.

Personally I think there is more to it than just the sign.
Joey is more than likely being targeted for his outspoken support of Officer Daniel Faulkner:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Geno%27s_Steaks_Front_Window.jpg

Go Joey....one of Phillys best.
There isnt much good about Philly these days.


27 posted on 12/17/2007 12:58:42 PM PST by donnab (saving liberal brains...one moron at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson