I'm not sure what you're getting at. Is it that you think Rootie is NOT and anti-gun pro-abortion, special rights for gays, guy who had more problems keeping it in his pants than slick Willie, and used taxpayer funds to facilitate his adulterous relationships? Or is it just that you object to this being brought up repeatedly?
Mmmmmmm.......the questions you pose would make a great poll.
“I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Is it that you think Rootie is NOT and anti-gun pro-abortion, special rights for gays, guy who had more problems keeping it in his pants than slick Willie, and used taxpayer funds to facilitate his adulterous relationships? Or is it just that you object to this being brought up repeatedly?”
I am merely objecting to using, as a “credible” basis for discussion, any article by Helen Kennedy - no matter what message she is trying to deliver. We would normally barf at her stuff and she is never objective.
Just because she happens, in this case, to reflect the prevailing mood here at FR, to cite her is disingenuous, imo.
The reasons Ms. Kennedy doesn’t want Rudy to get the nomination is diametrically opposed to the reasons Freepers don’t want Rudy to get the nomination. Unless we are here subscribing to the adage “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” I don’t know how we could ever be sympathetic to, or in concert with, the writings of Helen Kennedy.