Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Worry About Romney, Huckabee
Newsmax ^ | December 13, 2007 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 12/17/2007 1:17:18 AM PST by Tlaloc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2007 1:17:21 AM PST by Tlaloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc

Of course they want Huckster to run against. A substantial chunk of the Republican base WILL NOT vote for this liberal fraud in the general election. Ditto Romney and Rudy.


2 posted on 12/17/2007 1:20:34 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc

“Translated, that means that Huckabee really scares the pants off the Democrats...”

My thoughts, exactly.


3 posted on 12/17/2007 1:22:27 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

conservatives who appreciate free speech cannot vote for Fred either. He spent years trying to shut it down with CFR while ignoring illegals. Every conservative in this country understood this and said it loudly, yet Thompson and McCain went full speed ahead.


4 posted on 12/17/2007 1:25:15 AM PST by tompster76 (Amnesty: No aspirations of citizenship to illegals - ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Either Thompson will be the nominee or we will see Clintoon/Hussein in the WH.

Huckabee/Romney are pathetic.

Do we really need another Arkansas governor running for POTUS?.

5 posted on 12/17/2007 1:30:10 AM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc
Gotta love Michael Reagan, but he's off base here. (Also, I didn't see Fred mentioned in this piece at all.) If Michael wants to look at the odds, what are the odds that America would elect a Republican from freakin Massachusetts, the same place that routinely re-elects Marxist scum like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Barney Frank, Edward Markey, Bill Delahunt....?

That's not happening.

And the Huckster? A tax-and-spend, open-borders goofball? No. As American Republicans become more and more aware of that guy's record, they'll drop him like an apple with a worm in it. They're not gonna drink THAT Jesus juice.

6 posted on 12/17/2007 1:31:40 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tompster76

I find it remarkable the ignorance of those complaining of his position on CFR which had everything to do with attempting to rid the corrupting influence of money in political campaigns. While he acknowledged it did not work out in the manner he had hoped, at least he was trying to do something about it. His singular focus during most of his adult life while in public service was ridding corruption from government.

As to his position on illegals, if I thought for a moment he was deficient in that area in the least, he would not have my support, period. I have to deal with those invaders about as up close and personal as they come... 20 feet away from my house. I want every last one of them gone.


7 posted on 12/17/2007 1:33:51 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc

What a sophmoric analysis. I do not think the Democrats are worried about Huckabee in particular. They know that the conservative base will stay home on election day if Huckabee is on the ticket. Also, if Huckabee should get the nomination than the Dems have to be happy, since that will ensure, one way or the other, that a liberal, pro-amnesty, tax and spender, who parrots DNC talking points with regard to foreign policy will get in the white house.


8 posted on 12/17/2007 1:34:15 AM PST by NavVet (If you don't defend conservatism in the Primary, you won't have it to defend in the Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Judas juice.


9 posted on 12/17/2007 1:36:29 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Of course they want Huckster to run against. A substantial chunk of the Republican base WILL NOT vote for this liberal fraud in the general election. Ditto Romney and Rudy.

OTOH, as we discussed elsewhere, some Democrats will vote for Huckabee rather than Hillary...as if that's any comfort.

10 posted on 12/17/2007 1:41:59 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Hey, if I were a Democrat with an eye towards having supermajorities in Congress and in state governments, I’d want the most destructive and divisive RINO President you could possibly elect. You get a two-fer: liberal legislation they sign and a Republican base going ape$hit, while they get to rake in all the benefits of increasing Dem elected officials and a Dem President after their abominable reign is over. Think it can’t happen ? It’s happened with every RINO Governor in the past two decades in umpteen states (AR; CA; CO; IL; KS; MA; NJ; NY and OH, for examples). You’ll note two of those abominations are running for President, Huckster and Precious Willard.


11 posted on 12/17/2007 2:01:32 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc

Good analysis. Smart money says that Romney will beat either Hillary or Obama easily.


12 posted on 12/17/2007 2:02:08 AM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar

Romney/Hunter would be far more formidable. Huckabee can go back and get the rest of that theology degree.


13 posted on 12/17/2007 2:05:50 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar
Smart money says that Romney will beat either Hillary or Obama easily.

Smart money says Romney will lose in the primaries.

14 posted on 12/17/2007 2:09:14 AM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one

If the Republicans nominate anyone but Romney or McCain they deserve to watch Hillary nominate justices to the Supreme Court of the United States that would cause the socialists of Sweden to think “Wow, those guys are further left than we would feel comfortable with!”.


15 posted on 12/17/2007 2:12:13 AM PST by Bushwacker777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar

Sounds like your smart money is riding the short bus.


16 posted on 12/17/2007 2:18:53 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
A substantial chunk of the Republican base WILL NOT vote for this liberal fraud in the general election

Count me in that chunk. No way in hell I'll cast a vote for Huckabee. That snake-oil so called preacher is faker than Pam Anderson's lady lumps.

17 posted on 12/17/2007 2:24:49 AM PST by GOPyouth (Common Sense! Conservative Principles! Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc

This piece reminds me of Vizzini trying to decide which cup isn’t the poison goblet in “The Princess Bride”. Reagan outthinks himself trying to read the minds of Democrats instead of looking at Huckabee and seeing him for what he is.


18 posted on 12/17/2007 2:26:40 AM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I think that Huckabee would be the easiest candidate for the Dems to beat. On the other hand, he might be a good choice for VP. Whoever picks him as his VP gets instant credibility on abortion and gay rights.


19 posted on 12/17/2007 3:43:09 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc
Translated, that means that Huckabee really scares the pants off the Democrats

Just Democrats, huh? The grip upon my wallet has been growing for the last few weeks and I cannot figure out why. It might be the class warfare rhetoric that I have been hearing from this rising Republican...which is odd for two reasons: the first one should be obvious and the second one is because my household income isn't much to begin with.

20 posted on 12/17/2007 3:44:59 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson