[Codename - Ron Benjamin]

But what do they know? They’re just scientists, not politicians nor ambientalists.

[GOPPachyderm]

interesting reading.

[tubebender]

Bump...

[Robert A Cook PE]

Remarkably even-handed article.

[fso301]

Me thinks somebody car is going to be keyed, cat killed, house egged and office ransacked.

[Maelstorm]

Global Warming has never been about proof. The left is never concerned about proof they are concerned about political goals.

[Archon of the East]

These conclusions are in sharp contradiction to those of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which reached its conclusions using largely similar data.

Lying little maggots!

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/968

[george76]

over 19,000 scientists

http://www.oism.org/pproject/

[xcamel]

FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

---

[The Great RJ]

Global warming deniers who go against the dogma of St. Algore ...send for the environmental inquisition. (sarcasm)

[BeckB]

The UN lost it’s Oil For Food scam and are now looking for another way to tax the industrial world.

[samm1148]

I read this earlier this week; good article. They grudgingly admit the truth for a change. I don’t buy into man made global warming for several reasons:

Simple arithmetic yields more than 3 billion cubic miles of atmosphere just up to the boundary of the tropopause. No model can predict the movement of that much gas over both liquid and solid surfaces each of which is heating/cooling at a different rate at every second of every day. No model can predict that.

Global warming is a fact. No, that is a lie. There has been a warming trend but global warming works on the premise that it will continue warming. There is absolutely no proof of that. None, zero, zip, nada.

Warming has increased during the last one hundred and fifty years: again, a lie. There have been cooling and warming cycles since temperatures have been recorded. In fact the idea that climate should be static, which is a tenet of global warming, is absurd. The earth is immensely old and the climate has changed several times in several parts of the world.

Climate and weather are two different things. Technically true but look up the definition of climate. Weather is in the first sentence. How can they predict that it will warm fifty years from now when they can’t even predict the weather, a major determinant of climate, a week from now?

I personally tend to doubt that man can affect change of three billion cubic miles of gas. I don’t think we can generate the gross energy for that. But that is only a theory. And global warming is only a theory as well. It is unproven and not fact.

[steelyourfaith]

~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ™ ping~~