To: Man50D
It says volumes he doesn't think the Dems will look after national security in the White House. Both Clinton and Obama's records show they're not up to the task in that regards. We're sure the voters will agree.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
11 posted on
12/16/2007 12:27:03 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
It says volumes he doesn't think the Dems will look after national security in the White House.
You're falling for the same trap LIEberman has set for many other people. He's not strong on national security. It is a fact terrorists have entered this country posing as illegal aliens. Despite that fact he supports granting amnesty to illegal aliens. Living in Connecticut, I've seen him play both sides of the fence to expand his voter base. It's the same strategy the GOP has employed over many yeas to accomplish the same goal. The result is both parties melding into one and the GOP getting the type of candidates who support and agree with a socialist like LIEberman.
26 posted on
12/16/2007 12:33:50 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson