Yes, he said in the May 2007 debate that he supports an assault weapons ban.
The slime ball liberal puke can’t pass that off as a “ Well, I have to because I rule in a liberal puke state”!
He’s wants that for the whole country!
FRED is now hitting hard and often. Taking his argument directly to the People of Iowa. Huckelberry and Romney would both be such a poor choice for Conservatives. I pray that the People of Iowa listen carefully and choose a true Conservative like FRED.
FRED THOMPSON (true consistent Conservative Federalist) - NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERT (I’ll do whatever it takes to stop the bastards, include water-boarding) - 2ND AMENDMENT ADVOCATE (arm all legal citizens and criminals will become more hesitant) - SECURE AND SEAL THE BORDERS (don’t give them sanctuary anywhere, don’t hire them, don’t rent to them, don’t give them credit, don’t give them rights they don’t deserve, report all crimes committed by them, they will go home or we will deport them) - LAW AND ORDER (enforcement first and foremost with the laws currently on the books) - SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM (reform a program that can’t sustain itself and will bankrupt this nation) - DEFEAT THE DEMOCRAT (any fool they put up) – TAX SIMPLIFICATION (choice for the tax payer) - WON’T PUT UP WITH CRAP FROM THE MSM (including stupid questions by moderators) - PING!
He’s been consistant on that issue. He supports some form of an assault weapons ban, one that is less restrictive than the current AWB.
So if one makes it out of congress, he will sign it, just as President Bush would have signed it.
There are candidates who won’t sign an AWB. I guess if the AWB is your single issue, and you’d rather have Hillary Clinton as president than live under the remote possibility of losing your chance to purchase a machine gun, you should vote for someone else.
A lot of what Romney is attacked for never happened — like your suggestion he’s trying to hide from his support of a new AWB.