I don’t get it, Democrats rejected Edwards in 2004, why would they want him now?
It’s possible that the dems would look at the other two and see un-electibility (is that a word?)
Hillary has massive negatives. Obama is a fad right now and looks like a ‘nice guy’ in comparison and he has Oprah.
But what ... really ... are the chances of a Black guy named Obama with the background the guy has? The nasty little Muslim rumors were started by Hillary’s camp and are surely circulating underground as we type.
So that leaves Edwards to sneak through like the greasy little pig that he is.
>> Democrats rejected Edwards in 2004, why would they want him now?
Because Mr. Experience-Gravitas-Elder Statesman-Windsurfer-Nuance-Vietnam didn’t work out so well.
Democrats are often arrested development cases, too; who will vote for a teen idol if they are offered one.
This time there’s no Dean to compete with Edwards for the arrested development contingent. There’s no Clark to pull away wins that would been Edwards’ rather than Kerry’s. There’s no Kerry with the advantages above (plus the loaded wife). There’s only a rabid chipmunk and a poor young black child from the madrassa.
Oh yeah, and there’s no incumbent running, with Dick Cheney at his side. :)