Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BurbankKarl
Well, apparently it caused some problems downstream

The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again. I'm with the enviroweenies on this one. Patterned cutting leaving sections untouched would (probably- I'm no geological expert) have lessened the slides and prevented damage.

It is tough to balance between the "never cut anything" wackos and the "clear cut everything 'cause I don't live there anyway" corporate interests, but it is in our own best interest to do so.

17 posted on 12/16/2007 5:47:07 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed
In the right terrain and soil conditions, clear cutting makes sense.

This was obviously not the right terrain and the wrong soil conditions.

There's a thousand acre clear cut in Whitefield New Hampshire on gently sloping land that has seen no erosion and has created an "animal and bird cafeteria" with all the new growth.

It's just plain common sense.

The logging company should have selectively cut on the steep mountainsides out west or done a checkerboard pattern of smaller clear cuts.

20 posted on 12/16/2007 6:23:08 AM PST by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson