Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: llevrok

I doubt the synthetic part will be green enough so I’m sure the eccoweenies will have plenty to cry about.


2 posted on 12/15/2007 5:29:49 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
There really is nothing "green" about this technology. Natural gas is partially burned to produce CO and H2. A catalyst is then used to form hydrocarbons from the CO and H2. Another catalyst is used to transform the hydrocarbons into ones that do not freeze at low temperatures (bad for airplanes!). Once burned in the jet engine, the hydrocarbons form CO2 and H2O, just like what would have been formed had the natural gas been burned directly.

One can do the same using coal instead of natural gas. This was practiced by the Nazis during WWII and South Africa during the Apartheid years (and still is being used as far as I know).

5 posted on 12/15/2007 5:46:22 PM PST by Boss_Jim_Gettys (tagline withheld until further notice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson