[metmom]

If the ACLU supports it, there's something wrong. There's more to the story than we're being told. I always take a good hard second look when the ACLU appears to agree with something I think.

Notice this from the article:

'But the case was not just about a pair of Tigger socks, said lawyer Julia Harumi Mass of the ACLU of Northern California, who represented the families. "It's really about freedom of expression and tolerating individuality, which are core values of our society." '

[Amelia]

I don't see that wearing solid colored clothing to school is such a "bother", and I always wished the schools would require uniforms when my children were students - less expensive, and no worries, agonizing, or arguing about what to wear in the morning.

Our school does not require uniforms but has always prohibited clothing advertising alcohol, tobacco, or drugs, and sexually suggestive or profane slogans on tshirts.

I suppose we've been restricting the freedom of expression and individuality of our students as well?