Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58
Dr. Roland Florio was treating David Sacca...decide whether a physician is liable for injuries suffered by someone he never saw.

This is one of the most poorly written articles in the past week. The author seems to imply that Dr. Florio never saw the patient. Or is it that the patient wasn't seen by the doctor on the day he killed the little boy? Eeesh.

12 posted on 12/15/2007 2:02:06 PM PST by NautiNurse (Plants are people too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NautiNurse

I think the article is refering to the relationship between the doctor and the 10 year old that was hit.


14 posted on 12/15/2007 2:08:10 PM PST by Marak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse

Dr. Florio never saw the little boy who was killed by his patient’s drowsiness. The little boy’s mother is suing the doctor.

Completely absurd, of course. If a doctor told me to take some Nyquil and told me to take a teaspoon at night, I could drink the whole bottle, crash my car, and then the person I killed could sue my doctor.

Nice, isn’t it? Kind of like sueing gun manufacturers for a guy who fires a gun straight up in the air in a crowded place and kills someone.


16 posted on 12/15/2007 2:09:46 PM PST by Y Ceratotherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse
No - the injured person - the 10 year old boy who was killed - was never seen by the doctor.
17 posted on 12/15/2007 2:11:09 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (The Greens and Reds steal in fear of freedom and capitalism; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson