[Redbob]

"...she "wasn't guilty of [knowingly] facilitating nefarious transactions -- she was guilty of doing less work than she took credit for,"

"...she has a problem, that she plays fast and loose with the facts, she won't admit a mistake..."

And how is that any different from any other lawyere?

I still think we're better off running against Hillary than against Hussein Obama - HE's the truly dangerous one!
and he has a much better chance of appealing to "undecided" - i.e., easily swayed - voters.

[SkyPilot]

I still think we're better off running against Hillary than against Hussein Obama - HE's the truly dangerous one! and he has a much better chance of appealing to "undecided" - i.e., easily swayed - voters.

That is what the power broker Democrats have realised as well.

We conservatives are torn between that, and having such fun at seeing the Clintons hoisted on their own petard.

[Mr. Jeeves]

I still think we're better off running against Hillary than against Hussein Obama - HE's the truly dangerous one!

Obama vs. almost any of the Republicans is Kennedy vs. Nixon redux - if cheating is necessary, national sympathy will go to the telegenic guy. It will be necessary to nominate Romney and hope he can win a couple of Kerry states back by focusing on Obama's inexperience.