Skip to comments.
New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary? (Tomorrow?)
Riehl World View ^
| 12/15/07
Posted on 12/15/2007 8:27:52 AM PST by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 261-263 next last
To: Para-Ord.45
I`m FOR Hillary winning the nomination.Based soley on her negatives alone But if she goes down, she takes "the machine" with her. Even if Obama recovers some of it, it wont be the same thing.
I think Obama is easy pickings in a general election. We should all be rooting for this left wing novice to win the nomination.. Oh happy day, if this happens!
To: bigjoesaddle
” If it looks like Obama is going to win, Hillary will sneak into his room and rip out his jugular with her bare teeth before she lets him win.”
Now that’s funny!!
Maybe someone from CSI will have to investigate then?!
102
posted on
12/15/2007 9:23:39 AM PST
by
HereInTheHeartland
("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
To: Dionysiusdecordealcis
Obama is more dangerous than Hillary You mean like how Carter beat Ford? I just think his core coaliton is narrower than Hillary, and theres a true novice factor here. His foreign policy positions are incoherent, to say the least.
To: bannie
DUH ON ME!
I got that all mixed up. I THINK that I meant that hillary is the wicked *itch of the WEST.
I think I'll go to my corner now...
104
posted on
12/15/2007 9:25:13 AM PST
by
bannie
To: Jo Nuvark
Hillary must be dead, not MOSTLY dead.Politically speaking.
105
posted on
12/15/2007 9:25:23 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
("Liberals want to save the world for the children they aren't having." -Mark Steyn)
To: SkyPilot
I assume the illustration is from the time of the Bolshevik seizure of power or the period just before that—the banner in black with white letters reads “All power to the soviets!” (meaning the councils that had been set up, like in 1905—the word had not yet acquired the overtones it had later).
To: SeaHawkFan
The WASHPOST and NYT know everything. But do they dare print it? Some major players are indeed in possession of the DVD. Since the talk radio speaking tour began, requests are coming in for it. (I also heard a rumor that it's on ebay) Joe Trippi from the Edwards campaign and Michelle Obama were sent the DVD over two weeks ago. Will we have a late December Surprise? Will the NYT dare put a figurative
stake in the vampire's heart?
107
posted on
12/15/2007 9:28:07 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: REDWOOD99
Popcorn, please.
I agree![SmileyCentral.com](http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/23/23_28_125.gif)
108
posted on
12/15/2007 9:28:14 AM PST
by
ditto h
To: LdSentinal
Nuke ‘Em High!! Subhumanoid Hillary Meltdown
109
posted on
12/15/2007 9:29:51 AM PST
by
dennisw
(Islam - "a transnational association of dangerous lunatics")
Comment #110 Removed by Moderator
To: bigjoesaddle
Yeah, if she can't get nomination, no one will.
Typical Clinton.
To: PJ-Comix; Charles Henrickson
112
posted on
12/15/2007 9:31:31 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(I've been too busy for FR this weekend, because I did the things I refuse to let the invaders do.)
To: dennisw
![](http://www.zombietime.com/really_truly_hillary_gallery/Hillary41.jpg)
Nuke Her High!!!
113
posted on
12/15/2007 9:32:51 AM PST
by
dennisw
(Islam - "a transnational association of dangerous lunatics")
Comment #114 Removed by Moderator
To: tcrlaf
To: McGruff
116
posted on
12/15/2007 9:35:27 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
To: LdSentinal
“If it’s not you, how disappointed will you be?” Couric asked.
Well, it will be me, she said.
But she said she would stand behind any other Democratic nominee, if it came to that. We’re going to have unified party, behind whoever we nominate.
Clearly, she has considered the possibility she won’t be the nominee?
“No, I haven’t,” Clinton said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/26/eveningnews/main3540666.shtml
She was so smug in that interview. There is a difference between being smug and confident. People just don’t like her. I sure hope she isn’t Osama’s running mate.
117
posted on
12/15/2007 9:35:58 AM PST
by
Danette
("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
To: mtbopfuyn
She began the campaign way too early, but then she didnt ask me. Its definitely going to be another 4 years of the GOP.Chickens . . . . eggs.
118
posted on
12/15/2007 9:36:34 AM PST
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: LdSentinal; doug from upland; All
Wanna bet Slick Willie will have some “medical problems” and Hillary! will milk the sympathy cow for all it’s worth right after Christmas?
119
posted on
12/15/2007 9:36:49 AM PST
by
GQuagmire
(Giggety,Giggety,Giggety)
To: SkyPilot
![](http://bigheaddc.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/huma_hillary.JPG)
Right now - Hillary's flying monkeys and her lesbian sex-slave Muslim intern Huma are going ape $#^*.
Who will this Muslim sleeper agent latch onto after Hillary blows the primaries?
I think Huma looks a lot better with Obama than with Hillary. Obama could ditch his kooky wife and get a real Muslim wife
120
posted on
12/15/2007 9:37:28 AM PST
by
dennisw
(Islam - "a transnational association of dangerous lunatics")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 261-263 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson