Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India, China object to Bali U.N. climate draft ("This is completely unacceptable")
Yahoo ^ | 12/14/07

Posted on 12/14/2007 7:57:52 PM PST by Libloather

India, China object to Bali U.N. climate draft
Reuters - 12 minutes ago

NUSA DUA, Indonesia (Reuters) - India and China objected on Saturday to a draft deal at U.N. talks in Bali to launch negotiations on a global pact by 2009 to fight climate change, saying rich nations should do more to lead the way.

After overnight talks lasting beyond a planned Friday deadline, India told a 190-nation meeting that it wanted changes to a final text to strengthen the role of rich nations in providing clean technology and finance to help them fight global warming.

"This is completely unacceptable", a source close to the Chinese delegation said. Soon after resuming on Saturday morning, the talks were suspended to try to resolve the tangle.

But Dutch Environment Minister Jacqueline Cramer told Reuters the European Union, which backed a draft text presented earlier, said the Indian demands were "unacceptable to the EU".

If approved, a draft decision would launch two years of talks on a sweeping new long-term treaty to involve all nations and succeed the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bali; china; globaltaxation; globalwarming; india; warmingbali
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
The U.S., Australia, India and China are aware of the hoax. When will the shake-down end?
1 posted on 12/14/2007 7:57:57 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

When we something something to the UN that I can’t talk about online.


2 posted on 12/14/2007 7:59:57 PM PST by wastedyears (Duncan Hunter is like a cheeseburger and fries. Simple presentation with no frills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

?


3 posted on 12/14/2007 8:01:22 PM PST by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
When will the shake-down end?

When it is no longer profitable to those who perpetuate it.
4 posted on 12/14/2007 8:01:27 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Libloather
What? They want US to pay THEM to clean up THEIR crap?

After insulting the USA and that brave man, Steven Harper in Canada for calling them on their money grab and saying Canada won't sign any deal in which all nations must take part equally to reduce emissions of "green house gases?

I say screw you China, India, you are the worlds worst polluters, we do enough by buying your crap. When you expand your economy, do it in a CLEAN way, or else we will put tariffs on your dirty- made by polluting- garbage products.

6 posted on 12/14/2007 8:07:52 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“....changes to a final text to strengthen the role of rich nations in providing clean technology and finance to help them fight global warming.”

“finance” being the word I took most notice of. Typical. It always comes down to being given a handout with turd world countries. We are running a huge deficit, China has billions in dollars and STILL they think we should pay. Screw them.


7 posted on 12/14/2007 8:09:44 PM PST by Bogtrotter52 (Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
India and China objected on Saturday ... saying rich nations should do more to lead the way.

Read that as "This doesn't hurt the economies of the west nearly enough to suit our agenda..."

8 posted on 12/14/2007 8:10:47 PM PST by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
oops

"Canada won't sign any deal in which all nations are not required take part equally to reduce emissions of "green house" gases"

9 posted on 12/14/2007 8:11:16 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It’s no secret that India and China are opposed to any climate treaty that requires them to participate.


10 posted on 12/14/2007 8:14:20 PM PST by Blackyce (President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“The U.S., Australia, India and China are aware of the hoax.”

Australia has now been taken over by Gore-bots. Insanity is on the march.


11 posted on 12/14/2007 8:15:41 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
India and China are aware of the hoax.

They were aware from the beginning, but under Kyoto they had a free ride under "developing nation" status so they went along. I think this means the free ride might be threatened, and as I predicted they did a 180 on the subject.

12 posted on 12/14/2007 8:17:20 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogtrotter52
That's all it boils down to. Money. It has nothing to do with actually reducing so called "greenhouse gases". It\s about a massive transfer of wealth, which is why all these turd world Even though it's so painfully obvious, the media still will not acknowledge this. Shows where these elite media owners hang out- with those global government liberals at the UN.
13 posted on 12/14/2007 8:19:02 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

As a former resident of the great (albeit, socialist) and glorious Garden State, I wish I know what you were referring to. I’m doing my best to relocate back to the state … and the smell of cordite might be wonderful to smell in the morning (to quote a famous movie line), I can’t, for the life of me, understand your reference?

Private mail is acceptable.


14 posted on 12/14/2007 8:19:36 PM PST by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; xcamel

“The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming.”

- Professor Kirill Kondratyev, Russian Academy of Sciences


15 posted on 12/14/2007 8:20:12 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Cordite? What are you going to do? Shell them with some old, leftover, WWI & II British munitions? Cordite...yeah, right. Your cordite smells like bravo sierra, to me.

16 posted on 12/14/2007 8:20:20 PM PST by BlueDragon (This is reality? it's no wonder we like beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Libloather
After overnight talks lasting beyond a planned Friday deadline, India told a 190-nation meeting that it wanted changes to a final text to strengthen the role of rich nations in providing clean technology and finance to help them fight global warming.

In other words, give me free stuff and pay me. It's the kind of stuff I've come to expect from the homeland of Indra "middle finger" Nooyi.

18 posted on 12/14/2007 8:22:46 PM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogtrotter52
^&%$ oops again!

That's all it boils down to. Money.

It has nothing to do with actually reducing so called "greenhouse gases". It\s about a massive transfer of wealth, which is why all these turd world dictators are so hungry for it.

Even though it's so painfully obvious, the media still will not acknowledge this. Shows where these elite media owners hang out- with those global government liberals at the UN.

19 posted on 12/14/2007 8:22:49 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Sorry, the Aussies signed the Kyoto Treaty in the last couple of weeks as one of the first items on the agenda of the new government there.
20 posted on 12/14/2007 8:24:01 PM PST by Liaison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson