Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: digger48

Did they die because the polar bears ate them?

BTW - The deaths are an estimate. This raises my BS Flag. Whenever I see the word “estimate” these days I substitute it with “made up.” I may not be right every time but chances are very good I am most of the time.


8 posted on 12/14/2007 7:27:26 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dutch Boy
BTW - The deaths are an estimate. This raises my BS Flag. Whenever I see the word “estimate” these days I substitute it with “made up.” I may not be right every time but chances are very good I am most of the time.

Let me give you more reason to raise the BS flag higher.

From the article - "A Russian biologist estimates that as many as 4,000 walruses out of a population of some 200,000 died this year, a death rate that's two or three times the usual number."

If 4000 walruses die every year in a population of 200,000, that means the life expectancy for a walrus is 50 years.

But if that 4000 is 2-3 times the "normal number" then with normal numbers of deaths, the life expectancy for a walrus is 100-150 years.

The unnamed scientist is obviously full of crap.

37 posted on 12/14/2007 9:14:55 PM PST by TN4Liberty (A liberal is someone who believes Scooter Libby should be in jail and Bill Clinton should not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson