Your reply is so vague I have no response. Is there a point?
The reply showed little understanding of California's legislative process, the partisan composition of the legislature and the pivatol role a minority governor can play in those processes.
Here's a thought; If the executive is held by the legislative minority, the veto is a powerful weapon to provoke change in the majority.
Here's another: A partisan rogue in the executive who colludes with the opposition can not only destroy his own party, but also the state which he administers.