3/11: From Mistake to Mistake

The court that has judged the 3/11 case has made the second public writ of clarification of the sentence, where answers to diverse questions related to the compensations to the victims are provided, some allegations to the defence attorneys are responded and... certain aspects denounced by the independent media are corrected.

For example, the court could not help rectifying the part of the sentence in which it was affirmed, as Libertad Digital had denounced, that the suicides of Leganés had said goodbye to their families through a phonecard that was still active months after the explosion at Carmen Martín Gaite street [where they supposedly died]. According to the court, this one is a “dragged" error.

In the end, even the official media will have to acknowledge that, even for just bug fixing and quality control, they would have to declare us the “conspiracy theorists”, as public utility.

It is a pity that the court has not seized the opportunity given by this writ to correct other “mistakes”, that more than being dragged, they crawl through the sentence in a quite striking way: for instance, the mistaken statement by which the garbage bags from the backpack of Vallecas, the Kangoo van and the apartment in Leganés had the same characteristics. How can we swallow such affirmation when we have at our disposal a forensic report that says exactly the contrary, your honours? And it is not a minor mistake, since such non-existent “equality” in characteristics between the garbage bags is used as an argument in the sentence in order to try to “prove” the veracity of the evidences. That is the reason it is more complicated to correct it, isn’t it, your honour?

Perhaps, the most striking thing of the sentence is, precisely, the scarce attention to details and the poor quality of the arguments. If it was wanted to make a mend of sentence, it would have been necessary to make a little more effort. Some mistakes in the sentence are simply inexplicable. Unless someone expected that any hint of discrepancy were crushed the day of the reading of the sentence, by a carefully planned staging. If it is so, if someone thought that just a staging would suffice to impose the “official close-down” of 3/11, then the capacity of assessment of such person leaves a lot to be desired.

More precisely, it is not the issue of the plastic bags the only one in the air after the second writ of clarification of the court. I am afraid that this new clarification does not clarify anything, as we will comment soon.

If you want to know my opinion, the entire sentence of the 3/11 case is not but an immense mistake. A mistake, that as well as the Leganés’ one, is being “dragged” since a long time ago. Specifically, since the morning of 3/11 itself, when someone decided to begin an informal investigation in order to hide the real perpetrators of the attack.

From that dust comes this mud. And let’s see how we all shake off this dust from the road.

From mistake to mistake. Truly, the sentence is a ticking time bomb. To correct the blunder on the phone which the alleged suicides of Leganés said goodbye [to their families], the court has had to make a double mistake. I explain, as we already said in the Enigma 26, the first police reports told that the ones of Leganés said goodbye using three SIM mobile phone cards. However, later reports dropped one of those cards since the data from Amena [the mobile phone company] revealed that the corresponding phone was still working after the explosion [of the Leganés’ apartment]. Therefore, the court makes a first mistake (recovering that third SIM card [mobile phone number] that had been previously discarded by the Police), that in addition is combined with another one (to mix up the numbers of the SIM cards).

The second writ of clarification corrects the second of these errors, but the one that cannot be corrected is the first one. The reason is that it would affect the argumentation of the sentence itself, since the existence of this third SIM card in the hands of the “suicides” and the fact that belonged to the same batch of the one used in the backpack of Vallecas are used as evidence against the defendants and are also utilized as support to the weak argument that the ones that died at Leganés were the ones that planted the bombs in the trains.

As consequence, this double mistake by the court has a striking consequence; it is demonstrated, as a Proven Fact, that at least some of the calls “to say goodbye” carried out by the ones of Leganés were made through a mobile phone that did not appear among the debris of the apartment and that was still active after the explosion. This is equivalent to acknowledge, with all the approval of the court, that someone carried out those “goodbye” calls from outside the apartment.

1. Either the court did not bother to read thoroughly the summary of the case. Not even the articles published by the media that had studied this summary, where we have pointed out pretty clearly all the contradictions, including this last one carried out by the court.

2. Or it is not a blunder, but a “safety catch” as time delay fuse, that could be activated in the future in the case someone weakens. Is it possible that we are before a subtle backstabbing directed towards whoever carried out those false goodbye phone calls? It would have some logic, since the pact among multiple players gotten in the sentence is inherently unstable: it depends on all parts having each other well caught.

I think the second possibility is improbable, but the first one is also hard to believe; unless, of course, they were very sure of their positions and for them it was the same whether the details fitted or not.

Although the broadcasting of this information by the international media has been slow, Basque terror group ETA carried out an attack in France, killing two Spanish Civil Guards, on December 1st.

Raul Centeno (24) and Fernando Trapero (23) were shot, execution style, as they performed surveillance tasks on members of the terror organization, which is based in Southern France.

ETA has killed 207 members of the Civil Guard, the Spanish paramilitary security forces.

Isn't ETA reminding Zapatero what he still owes them now that elections are coming next March 9th?

We must recall what happened just before the last National Elections, when the cells of the Basque terror group fell so easily and some of their components started singing the tune of the 13 backpacks. Read 3/11: The Disinformation Campaign.

The pieces of the official version does not fit no matter what the judges do, leaving the link between what happened in the trains and the explosion of the Leganés apartment linked by weak circumstancial evidence.

More news on the case are coming, that might shed some light to how that official version was built.

My sympathies for the two young Guardsmen and their families. Also, for the GEOS operative who was killed in the Leganes incident, the ones who were wounded and their families.

Good job to all for getting some recognition for your efforts. You may be preventing further tragedies and saving lives.

Thank you very much, tanuki.

Truly, many Spanish security corps members and their families are living tough times. They risk their lives whilst they know that the Socialist government is secretly in talks with ETA and that it will tend to downplay any killing in order to avoid hurting the chances of reactivating the "public" talks after the March 9th elections.

Moreover, most if not all the Spanish mass media, controlled by a few oligarchs always pleased by a government that hates freedom, will follow the same tactic, leaving the victims as people that should be hidden and silenced.

It is shameful. I am afraid Spain is marching toward some kind mix between the Venezuelan and Lebanese "democracies".

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.