Problem is, there is NO change in GHG’s by “implementing Kyoto” protocols. And there is NO evidence of ANY kind that shows that temps are actually still increasing, nor that the rise from 1972-1998 was caused by man-released GHG's. Only a simplemindedly theory that STILL don't match recorded temps at any time in history. The climate models don't work when compared to real-world data. Now, nor in the past. But you believe them for the future?
Zero change in temps are expected from that treaty, as the IPCC/UN admits.
Billions of dollars in taxes to the UN, billions in extra research, and more billions in transfers of carbon sales to Russia (who signed the treaty to get money), African and SE Asian dictators, and European bureaucracies, and millions of lives destroyed by the energy restrictions IMPOSED by the Kyoto Treaty (lost fertilizer, hunger, no fuels in developing and impoverished areas, no electricity, no health care, no transportation, no cooking fuel, no pure water - just carbon sales and more expensive fuels!)
For the Bali Treaty, the cost rises to trillions.
FOR NO CHANGE IN TEMPS.
Your hypothetical homeowner is burning his house, his job, and his barn to try to get rid of a fly he THINKS might be in the attic of his neighbor’s house.
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2007/images/usa-temps-1895-2006b.jpg
People who use this chart to say global warming stopped in 1998—don’t impress me as being overly smart. Obviously El Nino and other factors have a year to year impact—but the little red squiggly line seems to be going up.
