I think if you substitute “definitely” for “probably”—as the media has done, my statement would be BS. As demonstrated in post 39, however, the statement is accurate. I agree that the media is manipulative, liberal, and completely untrustworthy. But if you can’t face the truth on there being a scientific consensus that human emmissions are probably contributing to climate change—then you are no more intellectually honest than Dan Rather or Bill Maher.