Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother
He also noted that two hired security guards not only refused to use their weapons, but refused to give them to parishioners who were begging for them to return fire.

So now it's not even OK for armed guards to shoot someone who needs shooting? Why the hell are they armed? In case someone unarmed dares question their authority? What a bunch of pansies. Should be tatooed with a vagina on their foreheads and have their weapons confiscated as well as all the money they've earned as armed security.

19 posted on 12/13/2007 8:27:01 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking
“Should be tattooed with a vagina on their foreheads”

You might want to rethink that. I believe the one that dropped the perp had one. Albeit in a different location. :)

23 posted on 12/14/2007 3:33:08 AM PST by DaveArk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
I think they were paralyzed by indecision.

"If I shoot, what's gonna happen to me? If I don't shoot, what's gonna happen to me?"

May never have fired their weapons except at a range.

. . . but that being the case, they are in the wrong business.

I should think those two jokers will have to change their names and leave town.

24 posted on 12/14/2007 3:37:22 AM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson