Arrests announced in Malibu's Corral Canyon fire

LA Times ^ | 12/13/07 | Andrew Blankstein, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

[Monica Alvarez]

Hi..
First of all only one of them is 27 the other were 18-23—>> still young boys! Young boys is not an age.. its a state of mind!

Secondly, this is at the beach MALIBU is a beach! Yes theres hills, But this particular area is off the beach.
They thought they turned off the fire. Whos to say another group didnt show up after them?? (remember this is a party spot) AND NO California does not all of a sudden go around and start posting flyer's or signs... they may give a warning to the ‘neighborhood’ about the status but they aren't going to announce it in the news. imagine “If you’re in the Malibu area where the bonfire pits are located off the beach, don't even think about using them! Santa Ana Winds are picking up and it may cause a serious blaze that may get out of control... and you will be charged with arson”.

Sorry it doesnt work that way.

They knew or should have known better??? So you’re saying that they should be charged with arson because ‘they knew better’... I never said dont take responsibility for actions. I said they are not criminals - accidents happen. And if they are charged they shouldnt be charged as felons! But they should be punished and take responsibility. There’s probation, community service etc.

The system in LA is so bad .. innocent people get locked up and guilty people walk away...

No one died.

[Monica Alvarez]

Yes, I just loved what came out in your sentence. 'Accident'; keyword. They are trying to charge them as if they did it deliberately! Once again it takes me back to —— this is a party spot!!! Im going to guess that possibly 2-4 groups ‘a night’ pass through here to party.

[Churchillspirit]

LOL!

Perhaps you should try living in Switzerland, then you could hear "Thank you for shopping at *******#38675534"