To: NavVet
How anyone could have thought Thompson LOST ground during that debate is beyond me.
Hunter did fine but I really don’t think he did anything to increase his support beyond where it is.
21 posted on
12/13/2007 7:30:38 AM PST by
RockinRight
(Fred Thompson spells gravitas B-A-L-L-S-O-F-S-T-E-E-L.)
To: RockinRight
Of course it’s beyond you, because your standard is subjective. Intrade is an objective standard. The only bias is whether or not one can make money on the contracts, so it heavily favors liquidity. That means its bias is AGAINST the low end candidates who don’t move much.
In Poker, if you can’t beat the board, you fold. Yesterday, Hunter beat the board.
.
.
.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
52 posted on
12/13/2007 8:34:48 AM PST by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: RockinRight
How anyone could have thought Thompson LOST ground during that debate is beyond me.
Hunter did fine but I really don’t think he did anything to increase his support beyond where it is.
IMHO Hunter is the only viable candidate but no one won or lost that debate because it was so poorly conducted by the moderator. How she could omit what most Americans consider the most important issue, illegal immigration, is beyond me.
119 posted on
12/13/2007 4:37:41 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
To: RockinRight
LOL, yeah, you are so proud in the attempt to silence Duncan Hunter and it is obvious in the debates. With what little time Hunter is given he always gets praise EVERY debate he is in. He is ALWAYS on and ready with a response.
144 posted on
12/14/2007 6:04:41 AM PST by
bushfamfan
(DUNCAN HUNTER '08: the only candidate whose record matches his talk.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson