[Mr. Lucky]

No, you have belligerently tried to make the argument that defeating the forces of terrorism isn't worth the price America is presently paying. That argument hasn't gone particularly well for you, so instead of re-thinking your position you have come up with sophomoric statements about beating my wife or that you think my pecker may be too small.

Sad really.

[rednesss]

Defeating the forces of terrorism has nothing to do with how much money we spend(that we don’t have). Your logic is akin to having a “corvette” complex. My question about whether you’ve stopped beating your wife was in reference to your loaded statement that my position must mean that I am against supporting our troops, it’s an age old statement meant to illustrate biaed, loaded questions, that have a predetermined spin to it. Democrats like to debate in that manner, for example, I’m not for hate-crime laws, now you and your typical democrat would retort, why do you hate black people, even though my position on the subject has nothing to do with race, nor am I bigot, but it is good at silencing people and stifling debate. As far as your pecker goes, which isn’t far, that was in response to your attack on my intellect. Insult my intellect, and I’ll impugn your stalk. Care to try again???