Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

I said Huckabee framed his faux innocent question in such a way to ensure maximum appeal to religious bigots, and I meant it. I am not calling anyone in particular a religious bigot, but someone who could delight in a phraseology so blatently intended to evoke a visceral “ick” response in the listener should go reread the Golden Rule and remind him/herself that WWJD doesn’t mean, “Who Would Jesus Diss?”


295 posted on 12/12/2007 2:57:43 PM PST by LadyNavyVet (An independent Freeper, not paid by any political campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: LadyNavyVet
WWJD is heretical.

We rely on "what Jesus said or did", not what we imagine He might do.

The Moslems got into a lot of trouble with this method by sitting around thinking of what Mohammad and his 12 Apostles might have decided or done in any given instance. They then based their Sharia Law on such thoughts, locked it up in 1000 AD or thereabouts, and have stuck with it ever since ~ irrespective of rank injustices in the text.

So, that's why WWJD is not relevant to this debate.

So, no extraBiblical stuff.

299 posted on 12/12/2007 4:40:14 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson