[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

It is not difficult to point to any mainstream religion and suggest that this or that doctrine is just plain weird (e.g., virgin birth, rising from the dead, transubstantiation, to name a few that come to mind).

Like evolutionism, which believes that life began as a sequence of chemical reactions of purely naturalistic origin, despite this contention violating several basic laws of chemistry?

[dmz]

Thank you for helping make my point. If you look closely at any closely held belief system, someone can say ‘that’s just weird’.

But (chuckling a bit), I’m not about to get involved in a crevo hijack of this thread. We can argue that on a more related thread :-)

[muawiyah]

You are making a transparent attempt to hijack the thread. Anyway, water, under 53 atmospheres of pressure, naturally forms itself into lengthy double-helix molecules.

Toss in some impurities and you've got DNA ~ squeezed into existence through universal forces.

Betcha' God can do that kind of thing.

[ASA Vet]

evolutionism, which believes that life began as a sequence of chemical reactions of purely naturalistic origin

The TOE does not address an origin.

[Strategerist]

Like evolutionism, which believes that life began as a sequence of chemical reactions of purely naturalistic origin

Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, just the origin of species.

You're about the billionth person to confuse abiogenesis with evolution.

[steve-b]

Hijacker on the thread! LET’S ROLL!