Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bocopar

I thoroughly enjoy being a rational denier of a man made global warming. Having seen some of the scientists and the models used to create the IPCC report back in 1999 during a college lecture, I’ve been openly derisive of any and every useful idiot and also the grant swindling academic whores who have latched on to this scam and build climate models that have no basis in reality.


7 posted on 12/11/2007 11:48:11 AM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JerseyHighlander
Here are my denials. As a professor who has published many peer-reviewed articles (although not in science), perhaps I should be burned at the stake on Al Gore’s altar:

- I deny that anyone can predict better than random any complex phenomenon 100 years in the future.
- I deny that replacing clean coal burning plants with wind mills and solar panels can change global climate.
- I deny UN models showing global temperature increases can be limited to 2 degrees Celsius with only a modest (3%) impact on GDP.
- I deny that replacing unleaded gasoline with E85 can change global climate.
- I deny that CO2 is a pollutant.
- I deny that carbon credits and trading schemes can change global climate.

I make the following assertions as a counter to global warming hysteria:

- I assert that many urgent problems will be unresolved due to global warming hysteria.
- I assert that global warming hysteria will lead to a depression if the US succumbs to UN mandates.
- I assert that many individuals will reap windfall profits from global warming hysteria.
- I assert global warming is a cover for world-wide socialism.

14 posted on 12/11/2007 12:23:35 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson