A broad consensus is developing among the world's scientific community over the evils of climate change.
Oooohhhh. Nice. A broad consensus, all fluffy and light.
But there is also an intransigent body of scientific opinion which continues to insist that industrial emissions are not to blame for the phenomenon.
Oh, dear. Those intransigents, again. Not very nice at all.
There is a broad consensus of ideology forming a democrat party. That does not mean the world should live that way. There is a broad consensus of ideology forming a communist party. That does not mean the world should live that way. There is a broad consensus of ideology forming a socialist party. That does not mean the world should live that way. That does not mean the world should live that way. Worth repeating...
Absolutely right on the bias, but the article did label the ClimateLiars as “prophets of doom”, a rather non-complimentary description.
Probably an editorial oversight for which there will be journalistic demotions at the Daily Mail.