Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
Well, then under what enumerated power do you think the federal government would enact such a measure?

The Supremes having ruled a number of times I'd suggest you ask them.

On a personal note, your support for transport of minors for the purchase of an abortion, or nose job, or tatoo, or boob job without parental consent is noted.

tacticalogic and Ron Paul represent a new wave in teenybopper rights.

BTW, tacticalogic, who foots the bill for this stuff.

A twelve year old gets an abortion under the Ron Paul exemption, without parental consent, thing go wrong.

The responsibility of the parent, or does Ron Paul and tacticalogic kick in.

136 posted on 12/11/2007 6:20:09 PM PST by SJackson (we're gonna change the rules and have voting only on the Internet, then we're gonna win!, Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

GWB has issued a public statement that he will veto HR 1592 (the “hate crimes” bill) because he says he thinks it’s “constitutionally questionable”. Do you plan on joining the inevitable liberal screeching that he’s “supporting hate crimes”?


137 posted on 12/11/2007 6:25:35 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson