Skip to comments.
The NIE Fantasy
WSJ Opinion Journal ^
| Tuesday, December 11, 2007
| BRET STEPHENS
Posted on 12/10/2007 10:23:12 PM PST by BIGLOOK
The intelligence community failed to anticipate the Cuban Missile Crisis.
"The USSR could derive considerable military advantage from the establishment of Soviet medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in Cuba, or from the establishment of a submarine base there. . . . Either development, however, would be incompatible with Soviet practice to date and with Soviet policy as we presently estimate it."
--Special National Intelligence Estimate 85-3-62, Sept. 19, 1962
Twenty-five days after this NIE was published, a U-2 spy plane photographed a Soviet ballistic missile site in Cuba, and the Cuban Missile Crisis began. It's possible the latest NIE on Iran's nuclear weapons program will not prove as misjudged or as damaging as the 1962 estimate. But don't bet on it.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: cia; iran; nie; nukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
12/10/2007 10:23:13 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
To: BIGLOOK
Our intelligence agencies misjudged the Soviets and we came that close to a nuclear war. The Iranians are not going to demonstrate such restraint, if heaven forbid, they get The Bomb.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2
posted on
12/10/2007 10:26:14 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: ASA Vet; Grampa Dave; Ernest_at_the_Beach; LonePalm
Our analysts hardly at work.......
3
posted on
12/10/2007 10:27:32 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
To: goldstategop
I read a very interesting comparison of the mindsets existential Soviets and the Islamists a while ago. It pointed out that the Soviets wouldn't risk all since they believed there was nothing else beyond their lives on earth. The Islamists, however. had their paradise and virgins to look forward to.
This is the one time I agreed with atheists.
4
posted on
12/10/2007 10:35:52 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
To: BIGLOOK
Thanks for the ping...
I like the last statement:
*****************
For years it has been a staple of fever swamp politics to believe the U.S. government is in the grip of shadowy powers using "intelligence" as a tool of control. With the publication of this NIE, that is no longer a fantasy.
To: BIGLOOK; SierraWasp; All; blam; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; kellynla; onyx; Brad's Gramma; Howlin; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I think this NIE was leaked to have this whole thing investigated in Congress, thereby planting it in the Democrats head they need to take action.
If Bush took some course of action, he would be wrong...even if Iran launched missiles against Israel, Bush would get blamed, etc. So just change the debate and get all the evidence out in the open.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yeah....a shocker.
Well that's what happens when politically appointed, obligated bureaucrats become entrenched and held over.
(Let's not forget the mess created by Gore and the Clinton administration in 2000. The Bush transition got off to a rocky start.)
8
posted on
12/10/2007 11:05:49 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
To: BIGLOOK
To: BurbankKarl
I’m not sure it is going to work out the way the anti-Bush folks thought it would.
But it certainly complicates slowing Iran down.
To: BIGLOOK; Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; ...
Thanks BIGLOOK for the topic and Ernest for the ping.
11
posted on
12/11/2007 12:09:50 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Monday, December 10, 2007____________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yes, I got cold chills. We absolutely have no clue to what extent our intelligence agencies have been infiltrated by limp di@ked, dim lib, wonders. Evidently, it is considerable.
12
posted on
12/11/2007 1:16:34 AM PST
by
singfreedom
("Victory at all costs,.....for without victory there is no survival." Winston Churchill)
To: BIGLOOK
There is some good analysis here but one statement sent chills down my spine.
“But that only means that we now have an “intelligence community” that acts as an authority unto itself, and cannot be trusted to obey its political masters,...”
WTF? Why would we want an intelligence community that “obeys it’s masters” instead of offering stark and forthright analysis?
I always shade my opinions by wondering what Hillary would do if she was in power. In any context this is a chilling statement from the WSJ.
13
posted on
12/11/2007 3:14:57 AM PST
by
Bob J
To: BIGLOOK
This NIE just makes the U.S. government in general, and its intelligence apparata in particular, look wholly incompetent. I hope President Bush is proud of his folks in DOS and the OGAs.
14
posted on
12/11/2007 3:52:30 AM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Good morning, Ernest.
Hate to think of a Shadow Government....too conspiratorial... but career holdovers from previous administrations in State, the CIA, Justice and other bureaucracies have been causing the Bush administration problems since the beginning. We know some of their names and discover new ones regularly; Wilson, Plame, Berger the Archivist and lately the authors of this NIE.
'A new broom sweeps clean' is a little ditty the GWB ignored and now he has a mess in his house.
(Out the door in 5.)
15
posted on
12/11/2007 7:55:12 AM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
To: BIGLOOK
I remember that very well.
16
posted on
12/11/2007 8:35:56 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
To: BIGLOOK; Grampa Dave
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks for the ooraging. Of course this NIE when carefully examined does not lead to the conclusion Iran is some innocent victim of circumstances. It is just being misused by those that have an agenda other then keeping Iran on the coals.
18
posted on
12/11/2007 5:24:17 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Duncan Hunter for POTUS)
To: BIGLOOK
Look’s more and more like Dubya isn’t going to do anything about Iran before he leaves office, and we know the dims will look the other way and pretend everything is OK. I guess we’ll find out for sure that the NIE is way off when Tel Aviv and probably some European city disappear in mushroom clouds.
19
posted on
12/11/2007 5:29:15 PM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Celebrate the season - December 19th - Clinton Impeachment Day!!!)
To: BurbankKarl
I think this NIE was leaked to have this whole thing investigated in Congress, thereby planting it in the Democrats head they need to take action. If Bush took some course of action, he would be wrong...even if Iran launched missiles against Israel, Bush would get blamed, etc. So just change the debate and get all the evidence out in the open.
Not to mention France, Germany, Britain and Israel saying the NIE is nuts and that Iran IS a threat.
Bush got burned being the front runner on Iraqastan, so I can see him sitting back a little and letting the others figure it our for themselves this time around.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson